Can an albatross use dynamic soaring to travel against the wind?
The Windward Turn Theory does not allow upwind dynamic soaring because there is always a large downwind drift angle. However, there is anecdotal and data-logged evidence of upwind soaring but with a suggestion of higher metabolic rates on upwind legs compared with downwind or crosswind-soaring. This suggests that a different technique is being used to achieve upwind soaring and that if the bird is not actually flapping then one reason for this greater effort may be higher-G manoeuvring.
Gliding upwind at constant airspeed, must involve a loss of height therefore, in order to do this, the bird must first gain airspeed greater than the wind and excess height which it can sacrifice. Before the upwind glide commences there must be a force, other than gravity, in the direction of flight to provide the acceleration of airspeed. This can occur if the albatross catches a horizontal gust or penetrates a shear boundary whilst in a steep angle of bank, during the leeward wing-over turn. This could happen in the lee of a breaking wave or in the wind shadow between two swells. See figure 18 & 19.
In normal 1G flight at the best lift/drag ratio angle of attack (3-4 degrees), the total aerodynamic force resolves into lift and drag respectively normal to and opposite to the direction of flight. If a vertical gust causes the angle of attack to increase close to the stalling angle of attack (about 15 degrees), the aerodynamic force is increased and tilted forward of the aircraft vertical and then resolves into lift and thrust. The aircraft accelerates forward and upward (the surge experienced by glider pilots flying into rising air). This motion reduces the angle of attack and the aircraft returns to a state of equilibrium so that the effect can only be brief.
As the bird penetrates the shear boundary at a steep angle of bank, the sudden increase in angle of attack, will cause a component of aerodynamic force to act momentarily as a pulse of thrust instead of drag. Because of the increased angle of attack this will be inherently high-G. Having gained an increment of airspeed, the bird then reverts to normal angles of attack. The bird can use the excess airspeed in any of three ways:
1 - It can gain height, or
2 - It can continue the turn and drop below the shear boundary in the downwind trough and gain distance downwind, or
3 - It can reverse the direction of turn and drop below the shear boundary into the upwind trough and gain distance upwind, gliding as far as the next wave crest. If the swell is deep enough to create an air-flow separation in the troughs between wave crests, it may be possible to find still air, although the swells may be moving downwind.
The increased load-factor due to the gust and the reversal of turn for upwind progress will take more effort than rolling out of the turn into the downwind trough, hence the greater effort and metabolic rate.
This gain of airspeed when penetrating a shear boundary is not the same as the Raylegh cycle of wind-gradient dynamic soaring. However, it is similar to the lee-soaring model of dynamic soaring practised by RC model glider pilots. The pulse of propulsive force is similar to the process of auto-rotation which drives windmills and spins helicopter rotors in power-off glides.
Figure 17 is a plan view showing a bird in a steeply banked turn to the right, the wind coming from the left. It shows how the aerodynamic forces change as the bird penetrates a shear boundary in a steeply banked turn - a wing-over. The left-hand diagram shows the bird in a steeply banked right turn in the lee of a swell and therefore in a light wind. In the right-hand diagram, there is a sudden increase in wind from the left as the bird penetrates a shear boundary. The sudden increase in angle of attack and load factor (G) changes the lift L and drag D components briefly into thrust T and lift C (which becomes a kind of centripetal force). The bird thus gains a pulse of acceleration of airspeed (and ground-speed) and then drops back down below the shear boundary into light winds and resumes a normal angle of attack.
This model depends upon there being a gust or a wind shear which will most likely occur in the lee of a breaking wave but cannot be guaranteed especially in light winds or in the absence of steep waves. Therefore paradoxically it appears that upwind dynamic soaring is only possible in strong winds.
When it appears that albatrosses are dynamic soaring upwind in light winds, there is an optical effect which can mislead the observer. There is an explanation for this optical illusion and it is down to those pesky triangles of velocity again!
See Figure 20. Here is a diagram showing how the bird appears to fly upwind. The ship velocity is CB, the wind velocity is AB and the wind velocity relative to the ship is AC . A glance at the flag at position C suggests the ship is steaming approximately into the wind. The bird is seen dynamic soaring along path DH relative to the ship (average direction DG) and is actually keeping up with the ship. The observer only sees the bird following path DH relative to the ship. He cannot see the motion described by triangle DEF. The observer on the ship concludes that the bird is making distance upwind.
In reality the bird is flying the dynamic soaring pattern along a mean air-velocity DE (that is the path relative to the air). Applying the wind velocity EF (same as AB) to that air-velocity DE, the birds track-made-good (path relative to the ‘ground’ ) is DF. The track-made-good resolves into components DG, lateral to, and GF parallel to the motion of the ship. Velocity component GF means the bird keeps up with the ship, (same as velocity CB). Angle d is the birds actual drift angle while angle tmg is the track-made-good relative to the wind. Angle tmg is greater than 90 degrees and therefore the bird is actually losing distance downwind.